

|
Open , Honest County Government |
|
PUBLIC SPIRITED CITIZENS of SEVIER COUNTY |

|
“ Liberty and Justice for all” |
|
About Us |
|
Without design and in a rather uncanny manner a group of diverse citizens and taxpayers of Sevier County came together with a common purpose to create an atmosphere wherein the government of Sevier County might be assessed and reformed for the betterment of all citizens of Sevier County. |


|
PUBLIC SPIRITED CITIZENS TARGETED
Local Public Officials Target Citizens
Recent filings of court papers filed in Knox County 7th of July, 2010, in the disciplinary matter of Herbert S. Moncier before the Board of Professional Responsibility, reveal local public officials, through county-paid attorney defending Larry Waters' interest in suits brought by spirited citizens in past two years, are now targeted for retaliation and investigation for what they say are libelous and slanderous statements published on the web by some who Bradshaw claims have connections to plaintiffs. The five suits filed during past two years currently pending are at Chancery, pending ruling at Court of Appeals and now the Hatch Act/Election Contest suits transferred from Chancery to District Federal Court by defendants.
PSCSC are NOT connected to SEVIER CORRUPTION!
Sworn affidavits indicate threats have been delivered to counsel for plaintiffs by Waters' counsel to the effect that 'investigations have been referred to the appropriate agencies and a criminal prosecution is probable'. Attorney Bradshaw's letter to the domain provider for Sevier Corruption dated March 20, 2010 directed to the administrator of the site and a reply returned through the same provider to Bradshaw, all posted on the site, stated words to the effect that 'we are not aware of untruths posted on our domain and if you will contact us at our email address and show us where we have posted untruths, libelous or slanderous comments, we will be happy to work through this matter', to which no reply was received.
All clients of Moncier emphatically deny involvement there.
Recent media quoted a county commissioner indirectly threatening suit against plaintiffs intended to recoup legal costs paid Waters' attorney as a result of 'plaintiffs having brought frivolous actions' against individuals and local officials of government. Plaintiffs' suits HAVE NOT been deemed frivolous in one single proceeding and HAVE NOT been heard on the merits of these issues, but, have simply been dismissed in part for lack of standing, which is a part of plaintiffs' appeals now awaiting a ruling. Plaintiffs suggest those with intent of purpose being to sue plaintiffs in retaliation for seeking redress for wrong doing committed by public officials or as individuals consider the provisions of the federal SLAPP Act first; secondly, these persons must first review who is receiving the benefit from costs expended on a contractual basis benefiting the Mayor, Waters, in his defense of his own interest and those individuals named as defendants in the Hatch Act suit who appear on the May 4 and August 5 ballot, certified as individual candidates being illegally represented by county-paid attorney whether they be incumbent or county employee. The county's taxpayers have no obligation to fund legal representation by individuals seeking office. Court records, in every case brought by plaintiffs, reflect county-paid legal representation furnished to private citizens sued in their individual capacity as well as individuals sued in their official capacity, whether it is the suit for certiorari, violations of open meetings, or the constitutional question and ouster of Waters. Isn't it about time taxpayers stop this waste of money? Rhonda L. Bradshaw has made an appearance in two cases now transferred to federal court on behalf of *ALL defendants who are on the ballot as INCUMBENTS, currently sit as public officials - at the cost of taxpayers; yet, she filed no answers nor made no appearances for three county employees, two of whom were successful in their race May 4; yet they remain unrepresented defendants in both cases.
Where, why and how does the county (LEGALLY) owe these citizen (incumbents seeking office) free legal representation whom currently hold the purse strings indirectly in their support of Waters, whom wheel and deal as they please in deference to other candidates who are merely COUNTY EMPLOYEES?
There is no legal authority for such representation, so, why would concerned citizens tolerate or allow such?
Shall Public Spirited Citizens stand up for you and demand your taxpayers funds be protected and such expenditures disallowed, or, what will your position be in this matter?
Taxpayers can sit back and await the outcome, or, you can opt to support these spirited citizens who take action by making your contribution to Public Spirited Citizens NOW at any branch of SEVIER COUNTY BANK – 'after all, isn't it your money'? |
|
Those Public Spirited Citizens do Good Work..................... Amidst the many negative articles published in Sevier County about those wacko citizens – those nosy intruding people credited with coming 'from far left field' by one mouthy commissioner always ready to speak his disdain – from their many efforts to redress wrongs, despite the court having stopped them in their tracks, they have been busy doing many other things not generally known to the public. The Mountain Press addressed in full detail developments in June 2008 surrounding the theft from the public funds of the General Sessions Clerk's office which had taken place five years earlier. This resulted in the clerk's audits showing her office was 'short' of more than $16K from the time Connie Holt had taken office. In fact the theft occurred in 2003 before her term began. The former clerk having resigned in 2004, this was left for some other to deal with, the Circuit Court Clerk had the responsibility of that office until 2004, the year the theft actually surfaced and as was found by county auditors. Alfred C. Schmutzer, II retired in 2006 leaving this matter unattended and unresolved, and like Schmutzer his successor James Bruce Dunn upon his election to the Office of District Attorney General moved into the top-notch position from that of his assistant, yet not so ready to take the reigns when it came to this prosecution. A review of the record here does not reflect how it came to be that neither of these seasoned prosecutors stepped up to their task – we see that at some point an indictment led to the prosecution of a former employee and sister to the office holder who presumed no responsibility for her office prior to retirement – finally was prosecuted by Berkley Bell, DA of Greene County whereby a Memorandum Order was approved by Circuit Judge Richard Baumgartner of Knox County. Noticeable is the fact that all local Circuit Judges (apparently) recused themselves or otherwise failed to participate in this matter. Citizens learned in May 2010, having flagged the story by the press, that less than one-sixteenth of the monetary amount ordered as restitution to Sevier County and the Sessions Court had been paid. Additionally, seeing in addition thereto other provisions from and upon which diversion had been granted - some of which were 200 hours of community service, court costs and the full restitution as set out in the order and a period of probation - a serious question arose as to whether compliance was ever really intended. The question of probation status was not shown by the record, from all of which the matter was taken up by citizens. Consequently, through their efforts and that of counsel for Citizens, this matter was called to the attention of the prosecution and all parties concerned. As a result thereof, the General Sessions Clerk eventually will have a clean record. This has been confirmed in writing by the Division of County Audit, Comptroller's Office, in that eleven payments were made to the Circuit Court as ordered but since the filing of their last audit report. Although restitution was not timely made it has now been made, compliance as to the restitution has been met.. Citizens consider their efforts rewarding and a positive move on behalf of county taxpayers and citizens. While all of the actions taken by various citizen realtor/plaintiffs, including those pending suits relative to The Hatch Act and Contest of Election, have been deemed by outspoken individuals vocally making their push for retaliation toward these individuals for litigation costs paid by the county as one which should be considered. This accomplishment in the recovery of this theft restitution might be claimed appropriately as an offset should that be the case, a thought which comes to mind. Letter written May 18, 2010 is on Mr. Monciers’ page. |